Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140205232019.GG28649@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-05 14:07:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I stuck such an Assert in ScanPgRelation, and verified that it doesn't > break any existing regression tests --- although of course the above > test case still fails, and now even without declaring an index. > > Barring objections I'll go commit that. It's a bit pointless to be > Asserting that catcache.c does nothing unsafe when relcache.c does > the same things without any such test. > > (Alternatively, maybe we should centralize the asserting in > systable_beginscan or some such place?) I don't have a problem with sticking an additional assert elsewhere, but I think ScanPgRelation, systable_beginscan are a bit late, because they frequently won't be hit during testing because the lookups will be cached... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: