Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
От | Christian Kruse |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140204193904.GB1361@defunct.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I'm doing some benchmarks regarding this problem: one set with baseline and one set with your patch. Machine was a 32 core machine (4 CPUs with 8 cores), 252 gib RAM. Both versions have the type align patch applied. pgbench-tools config: SCALES="100" SETCLIENTS="1 4 8 16 32 48 64 96 128" SETTIMES=2 I added -M prepared to the pgbench call in the benchwarmer script. The read-only tests are finished, I come to similiar results as yours: <http://wwwtech.de/pg/benchmarks-lwlock-read-only/> I think the small differences are caused by the fact that I use TCP connections and not Unix domain sockets. The results are pretty impressive… I will post the read-write results as soon as they are finished. Best regards, -- Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: