Re: updated emacs configuration

Robert Haas escribió:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> > I compute 6627 lines as modified.  What I did not do is handle _only_
> > cases with periods before the tabs.  Should I try that?
> 
> I don't have any comment on that specific point, but I took a quick
> look through one of these diffs and it looks like a lot of churn for
> no improvement.  So I'm not sure what we want to do here, but I don't
> think it's this.

I, on the contrary, think that the cases that are preceded by a period
are an improvement, and the rest are not (the opposite, actually, so
better not change those).  Maybe there are specific cases in which a
period-tab sequence should be kept, but that seems rarer.

I didn't check the entire diff obviously, so I can't comment on how good
about detecting comments the new entab code is.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services