Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140128174610.GE18333@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-01-27 15:25:22 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > This version adds a GUC called ddl_exclusive_locks which allows us to > > keep the 9.3 behaviour if we wish it. Some people may be surprised > > that their programs don't wait in the same places they used to. We > > hope that is a positive and useful behaviour, but it may not always be > > so. > > > > I'll commit this on Thurs 30 Jan unless I hear objections. > > I haven't reviewed the patch, but -1 for adding a GUC. Dito. I don't think the patch in a bad shape otherwise. I'd very quickly looked at a previous version and it did look rather sane, and several other people had looked at earlier versions as well. IIRC Noah had a fairly extensive look at some intricate race conditions... Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: