Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4?
> 
> >     http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51B59794.3000500@gmail.com
> 
> > I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to
> > handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they
> > are right.
> 
> Those regression failures certainly say there is something broken in
> the submitter's build, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
> I'm not qualified to evaluate the proposed changes, but I wonder why
> they're needed given that we have successful cygwin builds in the
> buildfarm.

Yes, that confuses me too.  Unless we get more details, we should ignore
the patches.  Thanks.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +