Re: Extending BASE_BACKUP in replication protocol: incremental backup and backup format
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extending BASE_BACKUP in replication protocol: incremental backup and backup format |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140114134137.GD8537@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extending BASE_BACKUP in replication protocol: incremental backup and backup format (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extending BASE_BACKUP in replication protocol:
incremental backup and backup format
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-01-14 14:40:46 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>wrote: > > > On 2014-01-14 14:12:46 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > Either way - if we can do this in a safe way, it sounds like a good idea. > > > It would be sort of like rsync, except relying on the fact that we can > > look > > > at the LSN and don't have to compare the actual files, right? > > > > Which is an advantage, yes. On the other hand, it doesn't fix problems > > with a subtly broken replica, e.g. after a bug in replay, or disk > > corruption. > > > > > Right. But neither does rsync, right? Hm? Rsync's really only safe with --checksum and with that it definitely should fix those? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: