Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression
От | Oskari Saarenmaa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20140114124305.GA28072@saarenmaa.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance
regression
Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for looking at this and sorry about the late reply, I finally got around to testing your latest patch. 20.12.2013 22:47, Alvaro Herrera kirjoitti: >> Removing the BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END block and just doing a 'SELECT FOR >> UPDATE' for a suitable row is significantly slower in 9.3.0 (314.765 ms >> vs 118.894 ms on 9.2.4). A 'SELECT' without a FOR UPDATE and >> BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END has the same performance on 9.2.4 and 9.3.0. > > I have come up with the attached patch. As far as I can tell it > restores performance roughly to the level of 9.2 for this test case; > could you please try it out and see if it fixes things for you? It'd be > particularly good if you can check not only the test case you submitted > but also the one that made you explore this in the first place. I didn't try this patch, but I built today's REL9_3_STABLE with the patch from your mail on the 31st of Dec (http://github.com/saaros/postgres/tree/alvaro-multixact-optimize-9.3) and ran the older version of my appliaction's test suite which has a case that times out after 3 minutes with unpatched 9.3. With the current patch the test case successfully completes in ~20 seconds which is a major improvement although it's still slower than 9.2 It also passes all other test cases in my test suite. Do you think it'll make it to 9.3.3? Thanks, Oskari
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: