Re: Regression Failure: CURRENT SOURCES/union&join
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression Failure: CURRENT SOURCES/union&join |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20138.1067636957@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Regression Failure: CURRENT SOURCES/union&join (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression Failure: CURRENT SOURCES/union&join
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes: > *** ./expected/union.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003 > --- ./results/union.out Fri Oct 31 15:15:50 2003 > *************** > *** 106,112 **** > two > ----- > 1.1 > ! 2 > (2 rows) > SELECT 1.1 AS three UNION SELECT 2 UNION ALL SELECT 2; > --- 106,112 ---- > two > ----- > 1.1 > ! 2.0 > (2 rows) I think this is just a platform-specific difference in the behavior of qsort(). Numeric "2" and "2.0" print differently, but they are equal according to the comparison operators, so it's mostly luck of the draw which one is selected for output. The original coding of this regression test expected that these values would be interpreted as float8, wherein there is no difference between "2" and "2.0". I'm kind of inclined to change the test back to using float8 so we don't see more of these reports. > *** ./expected/join.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003 > --- ./results/join.out Fri Oct 31 15:15:51 2003 > [ row ordering differences ] This also looks like platform-specific behavior --- the differences are in the sort ordering of rows with equal keys. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: