Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20137.1202341834@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes: > Le Wednesday 06 February 2008 21:35:54 Peter Eisentraut, vous avez �crit�: >> Yes, I feel we could use a group writeable patch queue of some sort. >> Perhaps an IMAP server setup could do the job. > I've read some developers appreciating the way review board works: > http://review-board.org/ > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/ > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/UserBasics Hmm, the info on that last page might be out of date, but what it says is that the only SCMS they really support 100% is SVN. The other ones they claim support for don't work [well/at all] with the post-review tool. It looks interesting though, and would alleviate a few of the problems people have mentioned with reviewing stuff that's posted as diffs. Has anyone here got any direct experience with it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: