Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

> On 12/31/2013 02:38 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Before proceeding the work, I would like to make sure that followings
>> are complete list of new functions. Inside parentheses are
>> corresponding original functions.
>>
>> toregproc (regproc)
>> toregoper (regoper)
>> toregclass (regclass)
>> toregtype (regtype)
> 
> Pardon the bikeshedding, but those are hard to read for me.  I would
> prefer to go with the to_timestamp() model and add an underscore to
> those names.

I have no problem with adding "to_". Objection?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp