Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131223125632.GC19795@alap2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-20 21:56:42 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> I wondered that, too, but it's not well-defined for all tuples. What > >> happens if you pass in constructed tuple rather than an on-disk tuple? > > > > Those should be discernible I think, t_self/t_tableOid won't be set for > > generated tuples. > > I went looking for existing precedent for code that does things like > this and found record_out, which does this: I think there's plenty precedent for C code, but here the problem seems to be that, when we pass a record that's originally a plain row, it's coerced (via IO functions) into a record with typeid/typemod set. So, for this to work via SQL, we'd need to add a notation that allows passing table rows to functions without being modified. That might be a good idea in general, but likely more work than it's work tackling in this context. > This appears to be a typical pattern, although interestingly I noticed > that row_to_json() doesn't bother setting t_tableOid or t_self, which > I think it's supposed to do. Yes, that seems to be a minor bug. Andrew? > Am I missing a trick? No, don't think so, I wasn't thinking on the SQL level. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: