Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131220191718.GD22570@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I assume without checking that passing reloid/ctid would allow this to > > work for tuples in a RETURNING clause; and if we ever have an OLD > > reference for the RETURNING clause of an UPDATE, that it would work > > there, too, showing the post-update status of the updated tuple. > > I don't understand what you're saying here. Are you saying that > reloid/ctid is a better approach, a worse approach, or just a > different approach? That probably wasn't worded very well. I am just saying that whatever approach we end up with, it would be nice that it worked somehow with RETURNING clauses. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: