Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131220125152.GB32720@alap2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-20 07:47:17 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Maybe what we should do is add a function something like > >> pg_tuple_header(tableoid, ctid) that returns a record, maybe something > >> like (rawxmin xid, rawxmax xid, rawcid cid, infomask int, infomask2 > >> int, hoff int). Or perhaps some slightly more cooked version of that > >> information. And then delete the xmin, xmax, cmin, and cmax system > >> columns. That'd save significantly on pg_attribute entries while, at > >> the same time, actually providing more information than we do today. > > > > I was wondering whether we couldn't just pass pg_tuple_header() a whole > > row, instead of having the user manually pass in reloid and ctid. I > > think that should actually work in the interesting scenarios. > > I wondered that, too, but it's not well-defined for all tuples. What > happens if you pass in constructed tuple rather than an on-disk tuple? Those should be discernible I think, t_self/t_tableOid won't be set for generated tuples. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: