Re: Multi Master Replication
От | Wolfgang Keller |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi Master Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131219155201.bb38120fa2a62d1cc0515944@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi Master Replication (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi Master Replication
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> 2. With sync replication, you have coordination problems and > therefore it is never (at least IME) a win compared to master-slave > replication since all writes must occur in the same order in the set, > or you need global sequences, or such. *snip* > You will never get better read or write throughput, Better read throughput is trivial to achieve even with other solutions than multi-master replication. And for better write throughput, the developers of Postgres-XC (supported by NTT, among others) beg to differ: http://postgresxc.wikia.com/wiki/Postgres-XC_Wiki http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/ As does Bettina Kemme (of Postgres-R fame). Sincerely, Wolfgang
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: