Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20131206133808.GE8935@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from
server log?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-06 22:35:21 +0900, MauMau wrote: > From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > >No. They are FATAL so far as the individual session is concerned. > >Possibly some documentation effort is needed here, but I don't think > >any change in the code behavior would be an improvement. > > You are suggesting that we should add a note like "Don't worry about the > following message. This is a result of normal connectivity checking", don't > you? > > FATAL: the database system is starting up Uh. An explanation why you cannot connect to the database hardly seems like a superflous log message. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: