Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131203153758.GC7383@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-12-03 10:29:54 -0500, Noah Misch wrote: > Sorry, my original report was rather terse. I speak of the scenario exercised > by the second permutation in that isolationtester spec. The multixact is > later than VACUUM's cutoff_multi, so 9.3.1 does not freeze it at all. 9.3.2 > does freeze it to InvalidTransactionId per the code I cited in my first > response on this thread, which wrongly removes a key lock. That one is clear, I was only confused about the Assert() you reported. But I think I've explained that elsewhere. I currently don't see fixing the errorneous freezing of lockers (not the updater though) without changing the wal format or synchronously waiting for all lockers to end. Which both see like a no-go? While it's still a major bug it seems to still be much better than the previous case of either inaccessible or reappearing rows. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: