Re: Extension Templates S03E11
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131202201716.GM17272@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extension Templates S03E11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David, * David E. Wheeler (david@justatheory.com) wrote: > On Dec 2, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> wrote: > > > Whether you're targetting a file system template or a catalog template, > > PGXN is not a complete solution, you still need to build the extension. > > This is true today, but only because PostgreSQL provides the infrastructure for building and installing extensions thatentails `make && make install`. If Postgres provided some other method of building and installing extensions, you couldstart using it right away on PGXN. The *only* requirement for PGXN distributions, really, is a META.json file describingthe extension. Thanks, that's a pretty interesting point.. I like the idea that we could provide a new make target which could build an 'inline extension' (or what-have-you) which could then be distributed and used by users either directly or with some client-side tool. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: