Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > > > If there were databases or users with default_transaction_read_only
> > > > > set in the old cluster, the pg_dumpall run will cause that property
> > > > > to be set in the new cluster, so what you are saying seems to be
> > > > > that a cluster can't be upgraded to a new major release if any
> > > > > database within it has that set.
> > > > 
> > > > That is *precisely* my use case which I initially asked about.
> > > 
> > > The use-case would be that default_transaction_read_only is turned on in
> > > postgresql.conf
> > 
> > Are you telling me which use case I initially asked
> > about on this thread ?
> 
> No, this is another use-case that is fixed the pg_upgrade patch.  The
> ALTER DATABASE SET is also fixed by this patch.

I see.

Thanks,
Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346