Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131126214833.GA9629@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority? (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any advantage of using SSL with a certificate of authority?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:30:08PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/26/2013 12:16 PM, Robin wrote: > > 1. A self-signed certificate can be issued by anybody, there is no way of > authenticating the issuer. > 2. Distributing self-signed certificates becomes a pain - if signed by a > CA, its easy to lodge your public key where everybody can find it, and > knows where to look for it. > 3. Maintenance becomes a problem > > > > while that's all true for public https or whatever, none of this applies to a > point to point connection like libpq -> postmaster. Right. I know of no mechanism to verify a certificate via a public CA through SSL. Browsers have a list of trusted certificates, but SSL alone doesn't, as far as I know. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: