Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karsten Hilbert
Тема Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Дата
Msg-id 20131123172421.GL4151@hermes.hilbert.loc
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:11:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> I also agree with *not* changing pg_dump, since it is not the charter
> of pg_dump to recreate a whole cluster, and the objection about possibly
> restoring into a database that was meant to be protected by this setting
> seems to have some force.

This is were the suggestion comes in (which was already raised)
to add some commandline option to the effect of
--ignore-default-tx-readonly

which, however, I agree with can be worked around by
projects (like GNUmed, in which context this issue
came up at all) providing restore scripts setting
PGOPTIONS appropriately ...

Thanks for all the work,
Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Следующее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Regress tests to improve the function coverage of schemacmds and user and tablespace files