Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA
От | Marko Kreen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131117120132.GA10778@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: appendPQExpBufferVA vs appendStringInfoVA
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:33:59PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 3:18 AM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm low on ideas on how to improve things much around here for now, but > > for what it's worth, I did create a patch which changes unnecessary calls > > to appendPQExpBuffer() into calls to appendPQExpBufferStr() similar to the > > recent one for appendStringInfo and appendStringInfoString. > > > Attached is a re-based version of this. It does not apply anymore, could you resend it? I am bit suspicious of performance impact of this patch, but think that it's still worthwhile as it decreases code style where single string argument is given to printf-style function without "%s". -- marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: