On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:59:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm not really seeing the point of s/transaction/session/ here.
>
> > Well, the problem with the original wording is that we don't take a new
> > snapshot for every transaction in the default read-committed mode.
>
> We take at least one snapshot per transaction, in any mode. Referring
> to sessions makes it even further away from being a useful concept.
>
> > Would you prefer I refer to statements, e.g.:
>
> 'Statement' might work.
OK, updated patch attached. Is "statement" too vague here? SQL
statement? query?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +