Re: RULE regression test fragility?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RULE regression test fragility? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131025135057.GF6832@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RULE regression test fragility? (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: RULE regression test fragility?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote: > On 2013-10-24 09:22:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > FWIW, I've repeatedly now thought that it'd make maintaining/updating > > > patches easier if we switched that query into unaligned tuple only (\a > > > \t) mode. That would remove the frequent conflicts on the row count and > > > widespread changes due to changed alignment. > > > Alternatively we could just wrap the query in \copy ... CSV. > > > > Hm ... yeah, it would be a good thing if changes in one view didn't so > > frequently have ripple effects to the whole output. Not sure which > > format is best for that though. > > Something like the attached maybe? +1 (but what are those silly parens in pg_seclabels definition?), except: > +-- disable fancy output again > +\a\t Should be "enable". -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: