Re: Reasons not to like asprintf

Tom,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> In short, I want to change pg_asprintf to return the malloc'd buffer
> as its function result.  This probably means we should change the
> function name too, since the allusion to asprintf is completely useless
> if we do that.  I'm thinking pg_psprintf for the frontend version of
> psprintf, but maybe somebody has a better suggestion?

Sounds reasonable, and I haven't got a better name, but I'm trying to
figure out why psprintf hasn't got the same issues which you mention in
your other thread (eg: depending on vsnprintf to return the "would-be"
result size).  I'm also a bit nervous that we only check vsnprintf()
success in Assert-enabled builds in psprintf, though I suppose that's
all we're doing in appendStringInfo too.
Thanks,
    Stephen