Re: logical changeset generation v6.2
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131015142504.GA14406@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logical changeset generation v6.2 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-10-15 10:20:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > For multi-master / conflict resolution you may also want all old > > values to make sure that they have not changed on target. > > The patch as proposed doesn't make that information available. If you > want that to be an option, now would be the right time to argue for > it. I don't think you necessarily want it for most MM solutions, but I agree it will be useful for some scenarios. I think the ReorderBufferChange struct needs a better way to distinguish between old-key and old-tuple now, but I'd rather implement the facililty for logging the full old tuple in a separate patch. The patchset is big enough as is, lets not tack on more features. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: