Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131010231432.GA7092@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #8467: Slightly confusing pgcrypto example in docs
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:05:50PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The changes shown below are incorrect, I think. > > > On 10/2/13 12:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > *************** gen_salt(type text [, iter_count integer > > *** 353,359 **** > > <entry>12 years</entry> > > </row> > > <row> > > ! <entry><literal>md5</></entry> > > <entry>2345086</entry> > > <entry>1 day</entry> > > <entry>3 years</entry> > > --- 358,364 ---- > > <entry>12 years</entry> > > </row> > > <row> > > ! <entry><literal>md5 hash</></entry> Uh, the table already has a mention of md5 crypt above: <entry><literal>crypt-md5</></entry> How can the later entry not be MD5 hash? > > <entry>2345086</entry> > > <entry>1 day</entry> > > <entry>3 years</entry> > > *************** gen_salt(type text [, iter_count integer > > *** 380,386 **** > > </listitem> > > <listitem> > > <para> > > ! <literal>md5</> numbers are from mdcrack 1.2. > > </para> > > </listitem> > > <listitem> > > --- 385,391 ---- > > </listitem> > > <listitem> > > <para> > > ! <literal>md5 hash</> numbers are from mdcrack 1.2. > > </para> > > </listitem> > > <listitem> > > *************** gen_random_bytes(count integer) returns > > *** 1343,1349 **** > > <entry>OpenBSD sys/crypto</entry> > > </row> > > <row> > > ! <entry>MD5 and SHA1</entry> > > <entry>WIDE Project</entry> > > <entry>KAME kame/sys/crypto</entry> > > </row> > > --- 1348,1354 ---- > > <entry>OpenBSD sys/crypto</entry> > > </row> > > <row> > > ! <entry>MD5 hash and SHA1</entry> > > <entry>WIDE Project</entry> > > <entry>KAME kame/sys/crypto</entry> > > </row> > Again, "MD5 crypt" is mentioned in the same table above: <entry>MD5 crypt</entry> so how can this not be md5 hash? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: