Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:59:39PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 10/10/2013 12:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:39:04PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>On 10/10/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>>How do we handle the Python dependency, or is this all to be done in
> >>>some other language?  I certainly am not ready to take on that job.
> >>
> >>Without considering any wider question here, let me just note this:
> >>
> >>Anything that can be done in this area in Python should be doable in
> >>Perl fairly simply. I don't think we should be adding any Python
> >>dependencies. For good or ill Perl has been used for pretty much all
> >>our complex scripting (pgindent, MSVC build system etc.)
> >Yes, but this is a run-time requirement, not build-time, and we have not
> >used Perl in that regard.
> >
> 
> 
> Nor Python. If we want to avoid added dependencies, we would need to use C.

Yeah.  :-(  My crazy idea would be, because setting setting
available_mem without a restart would not be supported, to allow the
backend to output suggestions, e.g.:
test=> SHOW available_mem = '24GB';Auto-tuning values:shared_buffers = 6GBwork_mem = 10MB...ERROR:  parameter
"available_mem"cannot be changed without restarting the server
 

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +