Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20131010145958.GM7092@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:24:26AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I actually had the thought that it might be something we'd integrate > > *into* initdb. So you'd do initdb --system-memory 8GB or something > > like that and it would do the rest. That'd be slick, at least IMHO. > > How would you handle the case that the machine (whether physical or > a VM) later gets more RAM? That's certainly not unheard of with > physical servers, and with VMs I'm not sure that the database > server would necessarily go through a stop/start cycle for it. Yes, going from a non-dedicated to a dedicated database server, adding RAM, or moving the cluster to another server could all require an initdb to change auto-tuned values. This is why I think we will need to auto-tune in the backend, rather than via initdb. I do think an available_mem parameter for initdb would help though, to be set in postgresql.conf. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: