Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20131009182800.GA7092@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 01:49:23PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > Having really bad defaults so everyone knows they are bad really isn't > > user-friendly because the only people who know they are really bad are > > the people who are tuning them already. Again, we need to think of the > > typical user, not us. > > I think a typical user will be happier if we simply raise the default > rather than stick in an auto-tuning formula that's largely wishful > thinking. You're welcome to disagree, but you neither quoted nor > responded to my points about the sorts of scenarios in which that > might cause surprising and hard-to-debug results. Well, pointing out that is will be negative for some users (which I agree) doesn't refute that it will be better for most users. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: