Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130927000320.GC29658@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-09-26 16:56:30 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > We have had several customers running postgres on bigger machines report > > problems on busy systems. Most recently one where a fully cached > > workload completely stalled in s_lock()s due to the *shared* lwlock > > acquisition in BufferAlloc() around the buffer partition lock. > > That's unfortunate. I saw someone complain about what sounds like > exactly the same issue on Twitter yesterday: Well, fortunately there's a solution, as presented here ;) There's another bottleneck in the heaps of PinBuffer() calls in such workloads, that present themselves after fixing the lwlock contention, at least in my tests. I think I see a solution there, but let's fix this first though ;) Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: