Re: logical changeset generation v6

Andres Freund escribió:
> On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier
> > reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about
> > the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name
> > pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to
> > type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it.
> 
> Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me).
> 
> pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace.

I had proposed pg_recvlogical

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services