Re: pgbench patches
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130711.091604.1302405232495877442.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench patches (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench patches
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Hello Tatsuo, > >> I have looked into this: >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1105 >> because it's marked as "Ready for committer". However I noticed that >> you worried about other pgbench patches such as >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1103 . >> >>> So I would like to know whether the throttling patch is committed and >>> then update the progress patch to take that into account. >> >> Shall I wait for your pgbench --throttle patch becomes ready for >> committer? > > No. I'll submit another patch to the next commitfest to improve the > progress behavior under throttling, if & when both initial patches are > committed. Ok, so I looked into the progress patch. One thing I noticed was: case 'P': progress = atoi(optarg); if (progress <= 0) { fprintf(stderr, "thread progress delay (-P) must not be negative (%s)\n", optarg); exit(1); } break; For me, the error message is not quite right, because progress == 0 case is considered error as well in your patch. I sugges you change the error message something like: "thread progress delay (-P) must be positive number (%s)\n", -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: