Re: strange IS NULL behaviour

On Fri, Jul  5, 2013 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Thu, Jul  4, 2013 at 04:29:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, it isn't, or at least it's far from the only place.  If we're going
> >> to change this, we would also want to change the behavior of tests on
> >> RECORD values, which is something that would have to happen at runtime.
> 
> > I checked RECORD and that behaves with recursion:
> 
> Apparently you don't even understand the problem.  All of these examples
> you're showing are constants.  Try something like
> 
>     declare r record;
>     ...
>     select ... into r ...
>     if (r is null) ...

Not aparently --- I already said I didn't understand the problem. 
Should I just mark this as a TODO?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +