Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130705133432.GC11640@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-07-05 09:28:45 -0400, Steve Singer wrote: > On 07/05/2013 08:03 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > >On 2013-06-27 21:52:03 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote: > >>Tried that, too, and problem persists. The log shows the last commit on > >>your branch as 022c2da1873de2fbc93ae524819932719ca41bdb. > >Ok. I think I have a slight idea what's going on. Could you check > >whether recompiling with -O0 "fixes" the issue? > > > >There's something strange going on here, not sure whether it's just a > >bug that's hidden, by either not doing optimizations or by adding more > >elog()s, or wheter it's a compiler bug. > > I am getting the same test failure Kevin is seeing. > This is on a x64 Debian wheezy machine with > gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2 > > Building with -O0 results in passing tests. Does the patch from http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20130705132513.GB11640%40awork2.anarazel.de or the git tree (which is rebased ontop of the mvcc catalog commit from robert which needs some changes) fix it, even with optimizations? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: