Re: [9.3 bug fix] ECPG does not escape backslashes
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [9.3 bug fix] ECPG does not escape backslashes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130704125818.GA30965@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [9.3 bug fix] ECPG does not escape backslashes (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [9.3 bug fix] ECPG does not escape backslashes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-07-04 08:50:34 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 07/04/2013 08:31 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:58:39AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>>michael@feivel:~$ grep line test\\\\a/init.c |head -1 > >>>#line 1 "test\\a/init.pgc" > >>... > >> > >>Really? I'd expect to see 4 backslashes in the #line directive, I think. > >Eh, why? The four backslashes come are two that are escaped for shell usage. > >The directory name is in my example was "test\\a". What did I miss? > > > > Isn't the argument to #line a C string literal in which one would expect > backslashes to be escaped? If not, how would it show a filename containing a > '"' character? > > [andrew@emma inst.92.5701]$ bin/ecpg x\\\"a/y.pgc > [andrew@emma inst.92.5701]$ grep line x\\\"a/y.c > #line 1 "x\"a/y.pgc" > > This must surely be wrong. I think it's correct. Quoting the gcc manual (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.1/cpp/Include-Syntax.html#Include-Syntax) "However, if backslashes occur within file, they are considered ordinary text characters, not escape characters. None of the character escape sequences appropriate to string constants in C are processed. Thus, #include "x\n\\y" specifies a filename containing three backslashes. (Some systems interpret ‘\’ as a pathname separator. All of these also interpret ‘/’ the same way. It is most portable to use only ‘/’.)" Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: