Re: plpython implementation
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpython implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130630123146.GB2950@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpython implementation (Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpython implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote: > > python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no plpython, > > only plpythonu - hence only one interpreter per backend is needed. > > > Is there any track of the discussion that there is no way to make the > sandbox? I managed to create some kind of sandbox, a simple modification > which totally disables importing modules, so I'm just wondering why it > cannot be done. http://wiki.python.org/moin/SandboxedPython This is the thread I was thinking of: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086401.html If you read through it I think you will understand the difficulties. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does > not attach much importance to his own thoughts. -- Arthur Schopenhauer
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: