Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130627010810.GA5069@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SMH on Salesforce-Oracle (Ned Lilly <ned@xtuple.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:38:04PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: > Anyone have any insight into what's going on with this > Salesforce-Oracle love connection? Seems kind of odd to hire Tom > and a bunch of other guys, then announce a 9-year commitment to > Oracle a few weeks later.... Well, logic suggests that Salesforce was considering moving to Postgres but, either because they got a good deal from Oracle or they were just bluffing about moving to Postgres, they are no longer considering it. The size, scope, publicity, and duration of the deal support this conclusion: http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/1964798 The press release specifically mentions Oracle Database. Of course, there might be some other conclusion, logical or illogical, but I can't think of one. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: