Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130618171940.GH5646@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-06-18 13:14:30 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:38:45 +0200 > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > How about "check if attnum is out of range according to the tupdesc" > > > instead? > > > > I can't follow. Minus the word 'NULL' - which carries meaning - your > > suggested comment pretty much is the same as the existing comment > > except that you use 'check' instead of 'return'. > > The difference is that I say what the purpose of the function is but > don't say what it actually returns. The code itself does that. > > > Original: > > /* > > * return NULL if attnum is out of range according to the > > tupdesc */ > > Obviously wrong so it should be changed. The NULL refers to the *meaning* of the function (remember, it's called slot_attisnull) . Which is to test whether an attribute is null. Not to a C NULL. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: