Re: How do we track backpatches?
От | Cédric Villemain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How do we track backpatches? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201306181215.27662.cedric@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How do we track backpatches? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le mardi 18 juin 2013 04:48:02, Peter Eisentraut a écrit : > On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 17:11 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Contributors, > > > > While going through this mailing list looking for missing 9.4 patches, I > > realized that we don't track backpatches (that is, fixes to prior > > versions) at all anywhere. Where backpatches are submitted by > > committers this isn't an issue, but we had a couple major ones (like the > > autovacuum fix) which were submitted by general contributors. The same > > goes for beta fixes. > > > > Should we add a "prior version" category to the CF to make sure these > > don't get dropped? Or do something else? > > A separate commit fest for tracking proposed backpatches might be > useful. Backpatches are bugs fix, isnt it ? I will like to have a mail based bug tracker like debbugs. -- Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52 http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: