Re: DO ... RETURNING

* Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@gmail.com) wrote:
> I agree with all your comments pretty much down the line.  Need top
> level CALL that supports parameterization and multiple sets that
> utilizes background worker (we have example spi worker that gives some
> hints about how pl/pgsql could be made to work).  Because it's top
> level (can't even be inlined to CTE), we can access behaviors that are
> not possible in current pl/pgsql, for example setting transaction
> isolation in advance of snapshot and changing database connection
> mid-procedure.

And this still has next-to-nothing to do with the specific proposal that
was put forward.

I'd like actual procedures too, but it's a completely different and
distinct thing from making DO blocks able to return something.
Thanks,
    Stephen