Re: pg_rewind, a tool for resynchronizing an old master after failover
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_rewind, a tool for resynchronizing an old master after failover |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130605153222.GA26593@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_rewind, a tool for resynchronizing an old master after failover (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewind, a tool for resynchronizing an old master after failover
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:12:17AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > The COPYRIGHT file shows that VMware is claiming copyright on unstated > > parts of the code for this. As such, its not a normal submission to > > the PostgreSQL project, which involves placing copyright with the > > PGDG. > > > Fwiw I was under the same misconception when I started at Google. But > this is wrong. > > We have no copyright assignments to any entity named PGDG. All the > code is copyright the original authors. The PGDG is just a collective > noun for all the the people and organizations who have contributed to > Postgres. As long as all those people or organizations release the > code under the Postgres license then Postgres is ok with it. They > retain ownership of the copyright for the code they wrote but we don't > generally note it at that level of detail and just say everything is > owned by the PGDG. > > I'm not a lawyer and I make no judgement on how solid a practice this > is but that's VMware doesn't seem to be doing anything special here. > They can retain copyright ownership of their contributions as long as > they're happy releasing it under the Postgres copyright. Ideally they > wold also be happy with a copyright notice that includes all of the > PGDG just to reduce the maintenance headache. Yes, completely true, and I was not clear on that myself either. Several people pointed out similar user copyrights in our existing code, which I then realized were not a problem. As long as the copyright details are the same as our code, anyone can hold the copyright, I think. Part of my concern was patents. Because VMWare asserts patents on Postgres enhancements, when I saw VMWare copyright code, my "concern" antenna went up and was glad to find it had all be handled by Heikki already. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: