Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130528211105.GB26313@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:58:33AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 05/28/2013 12:41 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > I'm happy with that. > > > > I was also thinking about collecting changes not related just to disk > > format, if any exist. > Any wire protocol or syntax changes? > > I can't seem to find a "things we want to do in wire protocol v4" doc in > the wiki but I know I've seen occasional discussion of things that can't > be done without protocol changes. Anyone with a better memory than me > able to pitch in? Sure, it is on the TODO list: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#.2Fcontrib.2Fpg_upgrade I can only get a link to pg_upgrade from there, so look two sections below that for "Wire Protocol Changes". -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: