Re: Commit subject line
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commit subject line |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130506171238.GF26481@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commit subject line (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commit subject line
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 06:41:53PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > In practice, something else must be further truncating it, at about 64 chars > > by the look of it - see for example > > <http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1UVTFj-00079k-2r@gemulon.postgresql.org> > > Ha. Good point. There's actually a bit of a bug in the code there :) > What it does is limit the length to 80-length("pgsql: $shortmsg"), > which is 64. It is supposed to limit it to 80-length("pgsql: ").. > (Since it substitutes the actual commit message where $shortmsg is > found). > > That's fixable though :) > > > > Re your other point, github at least seems to elide at about 70 chars - see > > <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/b42ea7981ce1e7484951a22662937541066d8647> > > - where Joe used a very long first sentence rather than a show summary line. > > I don't know if gitweb could be induced to elide after a greater length - I > > bet it could fairly easily. There does seem to be lots of spare screen real > > estate on the commit summary and history pages, which I think is where this > > occurs. > > Possibly. I can never find my way around that one though, and making > any modifications also has us ending up maintaining what's basically a > fork - unless there's always a config argument for it somewhere. So what should our goal length be? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: