Re: Remaining beta blockers
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130503161526.GF2467@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remaining beta blockers (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remaining beta blockers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian escribió: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 05:24:54PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > > The problem with an extra metadata fork is that it essentially would > > double the files in a cluster and it would also noticeably increase the > > amount of open files we need. > > There have been quite some complaints about CREATE DATABASE speed, I > > am not sure we want to make it even slower :( > > Agreed. We start to get into file system performance issues at that > point. I have often wondered if we need to create hash the files into > subdirectories for databases with many tables. Has anyone profiled > this? Modern filesystems use trees to store file nowadays, not linear arrays, and so that old scenario (long time to find one specific directory entry within a directory containing lots of files) is no longer that serious a problem. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: