Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130423210415.GC21856@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 02:25:08PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 22.04.2013 23:06, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:11:48PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >>>E.1.3.2.1. Write-Ahead Log (WAL) > >>> > >>> Store WAL in a continuous stream, rather than skipping the last 16MB segment every 4GB (Heikki Linnakangas) BACKWARDCOMPATIBLE BREAK > >>> > >>> Restructure WAL files to better handle timeline changes during recovery (Heikki Linnakangas) > >>> > >>> Restructure WAL files to use a more compact storage format (Heikki Linnakangas) > >> > >>Can you clarify which commits these came from? The first one is > >>clear (dfda6eba), and I think the 3rd covers commits 20ba5ca6 and > >>061e7efb1. But what is that second entry? > > > >Frankly, I found the WAL and timeline commits all over the place and > >could hardly make sense of it. I tried to collapse entries into > >meaningful items, but I need help. Can you suggest changes? > > Ok: > > * Don't skip the last 16 MB WAL segment every 4GB, with filename > ending in FF (Heikki Linnakangas) BACKWARD COMPATIBLE BREAK Uh, I am unclear why this is better than the original text. We don't normally explain things like WAL file patterns in the release notes. > > * Change WAL record format, allowing the record header to be split > across pages. The new format is slightly more compact. (Heikki > Linnakangas) Done. > In "Source Code" section: > > * Use a 64-bit integer to represent WAL positions (XLogRecPtr), > instead of two 32-bit integers. (Heikki Linnakangas) Added. > > Do we usually repeat the changes listed in the backwards > compatibility section later, in the "Changes" section? If not, then > instead of the first two items above, let's just have these in the > backwards-compatibility section: We do not repeat the incompatibile items later in release notes. I have added some of your text to one of the items, and added a mention that tooling will need adjustment. Please check the post-commit version and let me know about adjustments. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: