Armin Resch escribió:
> Thx, Albe. I tested both proposals, and I gravitate now more towards the
> E'' nomenclature since it avoids something like this:
>
> $pg_bs_char = ( $dbh->{pg_server_version} >= 90100 ) ? "\\" : "\\\\";
>
> Hoping for a long half life of the E'' nomenclature ...
E'' is very unlikely to ever go away; its main problem is that it's not
standards-conformant.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services