Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130330143112.GC12134@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? (赖文豫 <xiaolai913@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:08:44PM +0800, 赖文豫 wrote: > As we know, SSDs are widely used in various kinds of applications. But the SMGR > in PostgreSQL still only > support magnetic disk. How do we make full use of SSDs to improve the > performance of PostgreSQL? When the storage manager (SMGR) says magnetic disk, it is talking about read/write media with random access capabillity, vs. something like write-only media, which was originally supported in the code. Postgres works just fine with SSDs; the only adjustment you might want to make is to reduce random_page_cost. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: