Re: FDW for PostgreSQL
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FDW for PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130328123811.GR4361@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FDW for PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FDW for PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, all, * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Another thing I was wondering about, but did not change, is that if we're > having the remote transaction inherit the local transaction's isolation > level, shouldn't it inherit the READ ONLY property as well? Apologies for bringing this up pretty late, but wrt writable FDW transaction levels, I was *really* hoping that we'd be able to implement autonomous transactions on top of writeable FDWs. It looks like there's no way to do this using the postgres_fdw due to it COMMIT'ing only when the client transaction commits. Would it be possible to have a simply function which could be called to say "commit the transaction on the foreign side for this server/table/connection/whatever"? A nice addition on top of that would be able to define 'auto-commit' for a given table or server. I'll try and find time to work on this, but I'd love feedback on if this is possible and where the landmines are. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: