Re: Interesting post-mortem on a near disaster with git
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interesting post-mortem on a near disaster with git |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130324160857.GB27626@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interesting post-mortem on a near disaster with git (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Interesting post-mortem on a near disaster with git
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:52:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Over the weekend, KDE came within a gnat's eyelash of losing *all* > their authoritative git repos, despite having seemingly-extensive > redundancy. Read about it here: > http://jefferai.org/2013/03/24/too-perfect-a-mirror/ > > We should think about protecting our own repo a bit better, especially > after the recent unpleasantness with a bogus forced update. The idea > of having clones that are deliberately a day or two behind seems > attractive ... I think the lesson here is that a mirror is not a backup. RAID, ZFS, and version control are all not backups. Taking a tarball of the entire repository and storing it on a different machine would solve just about any problem you can think of in this area. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does > not attach much importance to his own thoughts. -- Arthur Schopenhauer
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: