Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130322140245.GA3701@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila escribió: > On Friday, March 22, 2013 8:57 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Amit Kapila escribió: > > > I think adding new syntax change is little scary for me, not for > > > the matter of implementation but for building consensus on syntax. > > > > I cannot but agree on that point. > > Sorry, I don't get your point. > Do you mean to say that you don't agree with me and want new syntax as > proposed by you to be implemented? On the contrary, I was saying I agree with you on the difficulty on getting consensus on this. I don't know where I learned this phrase or even if it's in common usage. After a not-so-quick search I see it explained here: http://www.perfectyourenglish.com/usage/but.htm -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: